Published on Saturday, 29 November 2014 12:37
For this important interview we welcome Tony Szamboti, mechanical engineer and 9/11 researcher, who joins us for a detailed discussion on crucial evidence that, in the words of his research group, "clearly demonstrate(s) that the reports produced by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) on the destruction of the World Trade Center (WTC) were unscientific and fraudulent."
With the group's recently-published white paper as our focus, "Areas of Specific Concern in the NIST WTC Reports" which lists 25 Points seriously challenging NIST's work in this area, we discuss striking new evidence demonstrating that NIST intentionally omitted significant structural components from its analysis of Building 7, and explore the almost inescapable conclusion that this was done in order to avoid the explanation of controlled demolition. We also discuss the potential these findings might have for legal action.
(Tony Szamboti is a U.S. Navy Veteran, he holds a Bachelor's degree in Mechanical Engineering from Villanova University, and has worked predominantly in the Aerospace industry for the last 28 years.)
Download Podcast (HQ 128 kbps)
[9/11, WTC, Building 7, Larry Silverstein, controlled demolition, Steven E. Jones, William Pepper, stiffeners, lateral support beams, shear studs, Kevin Ryan, John Salvarinas, free fall, David Chandler, Graeme MacQueen, Allan Rees, Richard Johns, Shyam Sunder, John Gross, NFPA 921, Richard Gage, Chris Mohr]